Journal of the Louisiana Health Information
Management Association Manuscript Peer Review Form
Name of Reviewer:__________________________
Name of Article:_____________________________
Due Date:__________________
General Criteria |
Met |
Not Met |
N/A |
Comments |
Topic or focus is of interest to our readers |
|
|
|
|
Content is valuable or important to reader |
|
|
|
|
Content is innovative or unique |
|
|
|
|
Essential points are adequately covered |
|
|
|
|
Writing is clear and unambiguous |
|
|
|
|
Language is appropriate |
|
|
|
|
Manuscript is well organized and flows well |
|
|
|
|
Length is appropriate to subject matter |
|
|
|
|
Content builds or advances the body of knowledge of health information management or its practice |
|
|
|
|
Illustrations, examples or references are relevant and sufficient |
|
|
|
|
Specific sources are cited |
|
|
|
|
Useful links are included in the article, as appropriate |
|
|
|
|
Additional criteria for research manuscripts |
|
|
|
|
Hypothesis is clearly stated |
|
|
|
|
The design of the research or investigation instrument is sound |
|
|
|
|
The statistical methods used support the investigations purpose |
|
|
|
|
A reader could replicate the operations described |
|
|
|
|
Analytical techniques are sound |
|
|
|
|
Data are clearly represented |
|
|
|
|
Tables are clear and accurate |
|
|
|
|
Data support conclusions drawn |
|
|
|
|
Additional Comments as needed:
Overall Review and Recommendations
Accept with no revisions_______
Accept with minor revisions as noted in comments__________
Accept with major revisions as noted in comments__________
Reject_______
Rework and resubmit__________
|